You call it Web 2.0
Posted by Gagan, Wednesday, March 1st, 2006 | About this Post
We have survived that first version of the web. We skipped many a flash intro, used many a sitemap to find our way around marketing hoopla. We even managed to give up old buggy browsers, adopted usability and accessibility in our everyday lingo.
Welcome to Web 2.0.
Much hyped, equally maligned. Web 2.0 is celebrated at events, taught in classes and even predicted to have the same horrible end that dot com’s had back in the day.
So what the heck is Web 2.0 and what’s all the fuss about? I give you this link to go do your homework about Web 2.0
. Long and short of it, Web 2.0 gets a lot of buzz in terms of the technologies and programmatic functionality that is now possible to deploy on the web. You have programmers and designers collaborating and making new businesses everyday of products that only they themselves will ever find a use for. At its worst, Web 2.0 is a narcissistic, self-congratulatory, self-referential and gimmicky me-too’s that have made their first attempt at selling a product for a niche market. Themselves.
At its best, however the evolution of the Web and its potential is only now beginning to become clearer to all that work for it (?), and those that have used it ever since they care to remember.
To me Web 2.0 is about doing what we never thought we would do on the web. Share.
Yah, you heard me. Share.
That’s the big word of the moment, and that is what at its core, Web 2.0 helps us do.
Web 2.0. Sharing. You can use words like ‘platform’ and ‘web application’ and ‘Ajax’ and ‘desktop functionality’ but really in essence the most amazing thing about the web today is the concept of sharing is becoming increasingly OK. We are slowly coming out of our cocoons, testing the waters and sharing out things that we know, and things that we love or hate.
(Caution: Words are used in the following part of the article to weave a tangled web of links!)
We rant and we celebrate. We collaborate like never before. We share things illegally, or legally. We share things we were too shy to share before and we share things that we just couldn’t share as easily before. We still spend thousands of dollars for things that we are told not to share and some of us go ahead and share those as well. We share out seemingly useless things, and then someone goes out and makes something out of that pile of information. We find many things by sharing, as we lose things in an increasingly big messy pile of unsorted information. Then we go invent folksonomies
to find those things. We hold a finger up at old ways of categorizing things (Dewey Decimal system be damned) and instead we put several tags to describe one thing. Much like how our brain thinks of things.
People are finding that micro-communities are more meaningful to them than the large ‘one-stop-shop‘ portals. They are even buying and selling things without the aide of mega-fee sites such as eBay.
We are living in a brave new world, but this onslaught of power hasn’t done much to ease our worries or workload. In fact, we seem ready to trade bits of our privacy at times if someone can make sense of our crazy digital world. And sometimes we just give away pieces of information about ourselves unknowingly. And sometimes we share out more than we had ever bargained for.
You call it a Platform; I call it Collective Wisdom. You call it Web 2.0. I call it Sharing.
I couldn’t agree more with your post. I posted similar comments about 4 weeks ago.
I’m tired of the hype around the technologies and the idea that there is a rush on to become ‘Web 2.0 compliant’. What a load of baloney. Technology will always change and always at a faster pace. There is no such thing as Web 2.0 compliance in my opinion.
It’s the social aspects of the Internet that define Web 2.0 for me, if we should use the term Web 2.0 at all! Blogs, wikis, forums, all sorts of communities around all sorts of things… that’s the essence of Web 2.0.
The company I work for recently launched a blog. Once fairly insular, the company is now sharing it’s experience with technology, encouraging emloyees to post about their experiences. It works both ways, the technology community benefits from the experience and the company gains marketing exposure.
Comment by Larkin Cunningham — March 2, 2006 @ 3:37 pm
I agree as well, great post. For one, I’ve always been defiant of putting technology up on a pedestal in general and for 2, I embarked five years back on using the web for its ’sharing’ aspects by building the small but unique Frenchparents.net, a local-yet-global community.
Parents – and women in particular- are surfers too!
However, I caution that sharing does not equate to ‘giving away’. Especially for small communities (like parents-with-an-interest-in the-French-culture, I.E a pretty narrow target), access to the online community cannot really be open to all and free of charge.
For the community to perform, someone has to manage it, the platform and the services around it, and advertising can’t support all the costs.
The 100% advertising model is also one that doesn’t appeal to the European side of my Canadian and French mind as too dangerous because it makes site owners subservent to advertisers, hence creating potential conflicts of interest.
**************
Comment by caroline I — March 3, 2006 @ 5:40 am