<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You call it Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.designstamp.com/opinion/you-call-it-web-20.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.designstamp.com/opinion/you-call-it-web-20.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: caroline I</title>
		<link>http://www.designstamp.com/opinion/you-call-it-web-20.html#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>caroline I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clotho.site5.com/~designst/opinion/you-call-it-web-20.html#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I agree as well, great post. For one, I've always been defiant of putting technology up on a pedestal in general and for 2, I embarked five years back on using the web for its 'sharing' aspects by building the small but unique Frenchparents.net, a local-yet-global community.

Parents - and women in particular- are surfers too! ;-)

However, I caution that sharing does not equate to 'giving away'.  Especially for small communities (like parents-with-an-interest-in the-French-culture, I.E a pretty narrow target), access to the online community cannot really be open to all and free of charge.  

For the community to perform, someone has to manage it, the platform and the services around it, and advertising can't support all the costs.

The 100% advertising model is also one that doesn't appeal to the European side of my Canadian and French mind as too dangerous because it makes site owners subservent to advertisers, hence creating potential conflicts of interest.

**************</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree as well, great post. For one, I&#8217;ve always been defiant of putting technology up on a pedestal in general and for 2, I embarked five years back on using the web for its &#8217;sharing&#8217; aspects by building the small but unique Frenchparents.net, a local-yet-global community.</p>
<p>Parents - and women in particular- are surfers too! <img src='http://www.designstamp.com/opinion/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
However, I caution that sharing does not equate to &#8216;giving away&#8217;.  Especially for small communities (like parents-with-an-interest-in the-French-culture, I.E a pretty narrow target), access to the online community cannot really be open to all and free of charge.  </p>
<p>For the community to perform, someone has to manage it, the platform and the services around it, and advertising can&#8217;t support all the costs.</p>
<p>The 100% advertising model is also one that doesn&#8217;t appeal to the European side of my Canadian and French mind as too dangerous because it makes site owners subservent to advertisers, hence creating potential conflicts of interest.</p>
<p>**************</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larkin Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.designstamp.com/opinion/you-call-it-web-20.html#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Larkin Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clotho.site5.com/~designst/opinion/you-call-it-web-20.html#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I couldn't agree more with your post. I posted similar comments about 4 weeks ago.

I'm tired of the hype around the technologies and the idea that there is a rush on to become 'Web 2.0 compliant'. What a load of baloney. Technology will always change and always at a faster pace. There is no such thing as Web 2.0 compliance in my opinion.

It's the social aspects of the Internet that define Web 2.0 for me, if we should use the term Web 2.0 at all! Blogs, wikis, forums, all sorts of communities around all sorts of things... that's the essence of Web 2.0.

The company I work for recently launched a blog. Once fairly insular, the company is now sharing it's experience with technology, encouraging emloyees to post about their experiences. It works both ways, the technology community benefits from the experience and the company gains marketing exposure.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with your post. I posted similar comments about 4 weeks ago.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m tired of the hype around the technologies and the idea that there is a rush on to become &#8216;Web 2.0 compliant&#8217;. What a load of baloney. Technology will always change and always at a faster pace. There is no such thing as Web 2.0 compliance in my opinion.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the social aspects of the Internet that define Web 2.0 for me, if we should use the term Web 2.0 at all! Blogs, wikis, forums, all sorts of communities around all sorts of things&#8230; that&#8217;s the essence of Web 2.0.</p>
<p>The company I work for recently launched a blog. Once fairly insular, the company is now sharing it&#8217;s experience with technology, encouraging emloyees to post about their experiences. It works both ways, the technology community benefits from the experience and the company gains marketing exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
